InSpace review 2026: a GEO subscription that sells pages, not proof
InSpace's NOVA writes 10 to 40 pages a month from $1,000/mo on a one-year minimum. We looked at it as a GEO buy and found almost nothing you can measure. Our verdict: skip it.
GEO is a measurement problem before it is a content problem. You can't fix how ChatGPT or Perplexity talk about your brand until you know which prompts matter, which engines skip you, which of your pages they read, and whether any of it sends a buyer to your site. Everything else is guesswork with a publishing schedule attached.
That is the lens we used for InSpace, and it's where the product falls apart. InSpace is a Dutch company on the High Tech Campus in Eindhoven, with a San Francisco office announced on 1 September 2026, and it says it works with 500+ brands. Its product, NOVA, is sold as "autonomous AI software" that decides which pages should win, rewrites existing pages or creates new ones, handles structure, internal links, metadata and schema, and publishes into your CMS. A customer success manager and a team of 20+ specialists sit behind it.
Our verdict: we would not sign it. Below is why, based only on what InSpace publishes on its own site as of 29 October 2026.
What InSpace says it does for AI search
InSpace's claim is that NOVA "includes GEO monitoring and optimisation focused on visibility and citations in AI-generated answers." That sentence is almost the whole public description.
The one concrete artifact is an example dashboard for a fictional brand, "yourbrand.com", showing answer share by engine for ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok and DeepSeek. It is a mockup. InSpace does not publish how many prompts it tracks, how those prompts get picked, how often they refresh, or which countries they run in. Its performance monitoring page says reporting data comes from Search Console, Analytics, rank trackers and CRO stacks. Those are classic SEO sources. None of them tells you what an AI engine said about you.
The measurement gap
Here is the list of things a GEO buyer needs and cannot find on InSpace's product, pricing, or service pages:
- A published prompt set, or even a prompt count per plan.
- The engines actually tracked, as opposed to the six in the example.
- A refresh rate.
- AI crawler logs. Nothing on those pages describes seeing GPTBot or ClaudeBot hit your site.
- AI-referred visitor and conversion tracking.
- An API, an MCP server, or a self-serve login where you could check the numbers yourself.
We're careful with the wording: these are not described on its product, pricing, or service pages. That is different from saying they don't exist. But a buyer can only evaluate what's written down, and on the measurement side very little is.
The bigger issue is structural. The same vendor writes the pages and grades the results. No independent tracker comes in the package. When the team that ships the work also owns the scoreboard, you have no way to tell a good month from a well-presented one.
The results InSpace does publish make the point. It reports average Search Console click growth across all clients against their start date, as of October 2026: +27.5% after one month, +96.3% after three, +408.9% after six. Those are InSpace's own numbers, an average across its client base, and they measure Google clicks. They say nothing about citations in ChatGPT or Perplexity, which is the thing the GEO pitch is selling. InSpace also lists a European Search Awards 2026 entry for "Best Low Budget Campaign (SEO): Small", which is an SEO category.
Price and the 12-month lock-in
InSpace does publish prices, which is more than many managed services do. Here they are in USD per month:
| Plan | 1-year term, paid monthly | 2 years prepaid | Pages per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratosphere | $1,000 | $700 | 10 |
| Milky Way | $1,700 | $1,190 | 20 |
| Universe | $3,000 | $2,100 | 40 |
| Multiverse | from $6,900 | n/a | custom |
The word "Monthly" on the pricing toggle is the payment schedule, not the term. The page's own script sends that option to the contact form as a 12-month term billed monthly, and the NOVA FAQ answers "Am I locked into a long contract?" with "You choose a 1-year or 2-year plan." So the smallest possible commitment is $12,000 for Stratosphere's first year. Milky Way is $20,400 and Universe is $36,000. The cheaper rates need two years paid upfront: $16,800 at once for Stratosphere.
On the one-year term that works out to $100, $85 and $75 per page. There's no free plan, no trial and no checkout. Every plan button opens a contact form.
The workflow adds one more thing to think about. You approve the strategy in month one, and a specialist reviews each page before it goes live. From month two the content calendar is auto-approved unless you flag or change items. Combined with a vendor-run scoreboard, that means the pages keep shipping whether or not anyone can show they moved your AI visibility.
What InSpace gets right
It is fair to say a few good things. The price list is public. CMS coverage is broad: Shopify, WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento, Wix, Webflow, HubSpot, Storyblok and Framer. A human reviews pages before they publish, and NOVA rewrites existing pages instead of only piling on new ones. Multiverse offers per-market strategy for brands in four or more countries.
None of that changes the core problem. You'd be paying at least $12,000 for a year of pages with no independent way to see whether AI engines started citing you.
What we'd buy instead
Start with measurement, then add content against the gaps it finds. That's how Promptwatch is built, and it's the platform we'd point an InSpace prospect to first.
Prices are published and billed monthly; annual billing is optional at 12 months for the price of 10. The free Explore plan tracks 10 prompts on ChatGPT. Professional at $245/mo tracks 150 prompts with 18,000 responses, includes 5 AEO articles, and adds Agent Analytics with 25M crawler logs. Those logs are IP-verified, so you see real GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot visits and the path from crawl to citation for each page. Visitor analytics ties AI-referred sessions to conversions through a script, a GTM template or the WordPress plugin. Professional has a 7-day trial on monthly billing. (Essential at $95/mo has no crawler logs, so we'd skip straight to Professional for this use.)
If the reason you looked at InSpace was that you want content shipped on a schedule, Business at $579/mo is the closer match. It tracks 350 prompts, includes 10 AEO articles and the automated Content Agent, which plans and publishes against measured visibility gaps on a calendar with a monthly budget, either through a review inbox or hands-off with a quality check. It publishes to WordPress, Webflow and Framer, and it comes with 100M crawler logs and 10M visitor events. There's no trial on Business. A full year on monthly billing is $6,948, still well under Stratosphere's $12,000 minimum, and you own the data.
The honest trade-off: Promptwatch is software, so someone on your side reviews drafts. And if your site runs on Shopify, Magento or HubSpot, direct publishing is an InSpace advantage.
For everyone else, our recommendation is to skip InSpace and run your GEO program on Promptwatch, where the prompts, engines, crawler hits and conversions are all visible to you. If you want to compare other options, our InSpace alternatives grid lists them.