Best GEO Software
Best GEO tools
AIclicks logo

AIclicks review

Ranked #27

Lithuanian tracker with real reviews, daily refresh — and engine access that's tighter than the marketing.

AI visibility trackerFrom $59/mo
AIclicks alternatives

Our verdict

AIclicks is the most independently validated of the new budget trackers — thirty-odd G2 reviews averaging 4.8, real named customers, daily refresh at $59 — and its citation intelligence is solid. Two things temper it: the engine-choice mechanic (3 of 10+ at entry; the '6 engines cheap' framing circulating in listicles is wrong), and its own reviewers' notes about crashes and shallow history. The Reddit-growth side business is worth an eyebrow too. Good value if 3–4 engines cover your battlefield.

Best for: European SMBs that want daily tracking with actual customer reviews behind it — and only need a few engines at a time.

AIclicks (Vilnius, founded 2024, unfunded) pairs daily AI visibility tracking with citation intelligence, 'AI Lift' recommendations, and AI article generation, and has one of the few genuine review footprints among the new trackers: 4.8/5 on G2 from ~30 reviews.

Read the tiers carefully: Starter at $59 includes 3 engines of your choice from a 10+ pool; getting 6 engines requires the $499 Business plan.

The validated budget option

Where most new trackers ask you to trust their own blog, AIclicks has receipts: roughly 30 G2 reviews at 4.8, a 4.4 Trustpilot score, and verifiable customers like ScrapingBee and Kiwi. The product runs your prompts daily across your chosen engines, maps which sources drive citations, suggests improvements via 'AI Lift', and can draft and publish articles into your CMS. GA4, API, and MCP arrive at the $189 Pro tier — a sensible stack for a small team.

The three-founder Vilnius team is unfunded, which cuts both ways: no burn-rate cliff, but also no war chest against rivals with eight-figure raises.

Read the engine math and the reviews

The marketing that circulates ('6 engines from $39') doesn't survive contact with the pricing page: Starter is $59 and includes 3 engines of your choice from the 10+ pool; Pro ($189) grants 4, Business ($499) grants 6, and full coverage is Enterprise-only. Pricing has also moved around historically ($79 → $59 with rotating promos), and the 3-day trial gives you barely a business day to evaluate a daily-cadence product.

Its own happy reviewers supply the honest cons: occasional crashes and features that 'don't work properly,' rigid tiers with no per-prompt option, limited historical data, and reporting that's still early-stage. One more editorial note: AIclicks also sells Reddit growth services — paying a visibility vendor that simultaneously monetizes seeding the sources AI engines cite is a conflict buyers should at least know about.

TierPriceEnginesNotable
Starter$59/mo3 (your choice)30 prompts, 5 articles, 3-day trial
Pro$189/mo4150 prompts, GA4 + API + MCP
Business$499/mo6300 prompts, account specialist
EnterpriseCustomAll 10+Custom volume

Who should buy it

Small European teams that want daily tracking from a vendor with an actual review trail, and whose competitive battlefield fits in 3–4 engines.

Teams needing broad engine coverage cheaply, deep history, or enterprise governance (no SOC 2 documented) should size up — and everyone should do their evaluating fast, because the trial is 3 days.

AIclicks pricing

PlanPriceWhat you get
Starter$59/mo (annual ~$47)30 prompts, 3 engines of choice, 5 AI articles, daily refresh
Pro$189/mo150 prompts, 4 engines, GA4/API/MCP, unlimited sites
Business$499/mo300 prompts, 6 engines, 30 articles
EnterpriseCustomAll engines

How AIclicks compares

ToolCategoryPricingBest for
AIclicks (#27)AI visibility trackerFrom $59/moEuropean SMBs that want daily tracking with actual customer reviews behind it — and only need a few engines at a time.
Promptwatch (#2)AI visibility trackerFrom $29/moTeams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding.
Otterly.AI (#4)AI visibility trackerFrom $29/moSMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.
LLM Pulse (#21)AI visibility trackerFrom €49/moSmall teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.

Key features

  • Daily refresh on all plans; 10+ engine pool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, AIO, AI Mode, Grok, Meta, DeepSeek, Mistral)
  • Citation/source intelligence and query fan-out analyzer
  • 'AI Lift' recommendations plus AI article generation with CMS publishing
  • GA4, API, and MCP integrations from the $189 Pro tier
Strengths
  • Real review footprint: G2 4.8/5 (~30 reviews), Trustpilot 4.4/5 — rare in this wave of tools
  • Daily refresh even at entry tier
  • Named customers (ScrapingBee, Kiwi) that actually check out
  • Fast support is consistently praised by reviewers
Limitations
  • Starter's $59 buys only 3 engines of your choice; 4 at $189, 6 at $499, all engines Enterprise-only
  • G2 reviewers report early-stage instability: 'sometimes the program crashes, and not all features work properly'
  • Rigid predefined packages — reviewers ask for per-prompt pricing that doesn't exist
  • Shallow historical data; reviewers rely on external tools to choose prompts
  • 3-day trial is the shortest in the category
  • Also sells Reddit growth services and 'ChatGPT ads' — a vendor monetizing the manipulation of sources its own tool measures

Frequently asked questions

How many engines do I get at $59?

Three, chosen from the 10+ pool (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity are the defaults). Four engines need the $189 Pro tier and six need $499 Business — the '6 engines cheap' claims in circulating listicles are wrong.

Is AIclicks stable?

Mostly, with caveats its own G2 reviewers volunteer: occasional crashes, features that misbehave, and shallow historical data. Sentiment is genuinely positive (4.8 from ~30 reviews) but the product is visibly early-stage.

Why does the Reddit services thing matter?

AIclicks also sells Reddit growth services — paid seeding of a platform AI engines heavily cite. A vendor measuring AI visibility while monetizing manipulation of its sources is a conflict of interest worth weighing, even if the tracker itself is honest.

Best AIclicks alternatives

See all
Promptwatch logo

Promptwatch

#2AI visibility tracker
From $29/mo

Daily AI visibility tracking with screenshot evidence, instant alerts, and competitor share across every major engine.

Best for: Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding.

  • Six engines with daily cadence at SMB pricing
  • Screenshot evidence behind every data point
Read the full Promptwatch review
Otterly.AI logo

Otterly.AI

#4AI visibility tracker
From $29/mo

The easiest standalone GEO tracker to set up — a working dashboard inside an hour.

Best for: SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.

  • Fastest setup in the category
  • Genuine free trial without a credit card
Read the full Otterly.AI review
LLM Pulse logo

LLM Pulse

#21AI visibility tracker
From €49/mo

Bootstrapped Barcelona tracker with honest pricing, unlimited seats, and MCP on every plan.

Best for: Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.

  • Genuinely transparent: published pricing, 14-day trial, unlimited seats everywhere
  • Bootstrapped and profitable — no VC burn-rate risk, unlike much of the category
Read the full LLM Pulse review
Gauge logo

Gauge

#22AI visibility tracker
From $599/mo

YC-backed tracker with daily 600-prompt volume and a built-in content engine.

Best for: Teams that want maximum daily answer volume plus content production in one tool — and accept betting on a lightly-funded startup with zero review footprint.

  • Best per-answer economics in the category: ~108,000 answers/mo at $599
  • Daily cadence on everything, not weekly
Read the full Gauge review