CitedSpy review
Ranked #24Flat $19/mo, six engines, every tier — the indie-friendly GEO tracker.
Our verdict
CitedSpy undercuts nearly every tracker on sticker price — six engines plus AI Overviews from $16/mo — but it's the least-evidenced live product in this list: not one independent review exists, its own pages disagree about prices, and its changelog documents the kind of bugs (blank sentiment, impossible win-rates) that shake trust in the numbers. Fine as a cheap experiment; not yet fit to be your system of record.
Best for: Price-sensitive experimenters who want broad engine coverage cheaply and accept betting on an unproven vendor.
CitedSpy tracks your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and Grok, with every engine included on every tier and no per-engine surcharges.
The pitch is predictability: flat pricing, no credit math, and a 'what to fix next' insight layer that punches above the price point.
The budget pitch
CitedSpy tracks brand mentions and citations across six AI engines plus Google AI Overviews, running prompts up to seven times a week, with competitor comparison and sentiment — at prices that start around $16/mo. On paper that's the cheapest multi-engine coverage in the category, and for a solo founder wanting a weekly visibility pulse it's an almost risk-free spend.
The feature list reads like the bigger trackers: prompt tracking, source analysis, win-rate comparisons, scheduled reports.
The evidence gap
Diligence comes up empty in every direction. There are no independent reviews on any major platform. The site's own pricing is inconsistent — entry listed at $16 in one place and $19 in another, top tier $333 vs $399 — which suggests pages are drifting out of sync. The public changelog, to its credit, is transparent, but what it documents is concerning: fixed bugs that had shipped blank sentiment reports and 100% win-rates.
The '90% accuracy' marketing claim has no published methodology, agency essentials (white-label, API, Looker Studio) are top-tier-only, and the ToS reserves the right to modify or discontinue features at any time. None of this is damning for a young product — it just defines the bet you're making.
| Trust check | Result |
|---|---|
| Independent reviews | None found anywhere |
| Pricing consistency on own site | Conflicting ($16/$19 entry; $333/$399 top) |
| Documented bugs (own changelog) | Blank sentiment, 100% win-rate errors |
| Accuracy claim | '90%' — self-reported, no methodology |
| Agency features | Top tier only |
Who should buy it
Bootstrappers and experimenters who want the cheapest possible multi-engine signal and will sanity-check its numbers against reality for a month before trusting them.
Anyone making budget decisions or client reports off the data should pay more for a tracker with a verifiable track record.
CitedSpy pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | ~$16–19/mo (site inconsistent) | Core tracking, limited prompts |
| Mid tiers | Scaling | More prompts, competitors, sentiment |
| Top tier | ~$333–399/mo (site inconsistent) | White-label, API, Looker Studio |
How CitedSpy compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| CitedSpy (#24) | AI visibility tracker | From $16/mo | Price-sensitive experimenters who want broad engine coverage cheaply and accept betting on an unproven vendor. |
| Promptwatch (#2) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding. |
| Otterly.AI (#4) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data. |
| LLM Pulse (#21) | AI visibility tracker | From €49/mo | Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence. |
Key features
- Six-engine coverage on all tiers
- Flat-fee pricing, no credits
- Optimization insights included
- Self-serve trial
Frequently asked questions
Is CitedSpy legit?
It's a real, functioning product with unusually transparent changelogs — but zero independent reviews exist and its own pages show conflicting prices. Treat it as an early-stage bet, not an established vendor.
How accurate is its data?
Unknown. The 90% accuracy claim is self-reported with no methodology, and the changelog shows recently-fixed bugs like blank sentiment reports. Validate its numbers against manual spot-checks before relying on them.
Can agencies use CitedSpy?
Only on the top tier (~$333–399/mo), where white-label, API, and Looker Studio unlock. At that price, established trackers with review track records compete directly.
Best CitedSpy alternatives
See allDaily AI visibility tracking with screenshot evidence, instant alerts, and competitor share across every major engine.
Best for: Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding.
- Six engines with daily cadence at SMB pricing
- Screenshot evidence behind every data point
The easiest standalone GEO tracker to set up — a working dashboard inside an hour.
Best for: SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.
- Fastest setup in the category
- Genuine free trial without a credit card
Bootstrapped Barcelona tracker with honest pricing, unlimited seats, and MCP on every plan.
Best for: Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.
- Genuinely transparent: published pricing, 14-day trial, unlimited seats everywhere
- Bootstrapped and profitable — no VC burn-rate risk, unlike much of the category
YC-backed tracker with daily 600-prompt volume and a built-in content engine.
Best for: Teams that want maximum daily answer volume plus content production in one tool — and accept betting on a lightly-funded startup with zero review footprint.
- Best per-answer economics in the category: ~108,000 answers/mo at $599
- Daily cadence on everything, not weekly