Peec AI review
Ranked #39Prompt-level AI visibility tracking with clean scoring and screenshot audit trails.
Our verdict
Peec earned its reputation honestly — $10M ARR in 16 months, $29M raised, a 4.9 on G2, and the cleanest tracking UX in the category with unlimited seats and daily data. The critical read: the pricing is quietly modular (every tier includes just 3 models; the rest cost $35–165/mo each), there's no historical backfill, and it answers 'where do we appear?' without touching 'what do we do about it?'. Excellent tracker, incomplete platform, real cost above sticker.
Best for: Marketing teams that want the category's most polished tracking dashboard and will pay per-model add-ons to complete the coverage.
Peec AI focuses on prompt-level monitoring: you define the prompts that matter for your brand, and Peec tracks visibility, sources, and competitor share for each one across the major AI engines.
Screenshot audit trails make every data point defensible in front of stakeholders — useful when you need to prove to a client or executive that a number is real.
Why it grew so fast
Peec's execution is the story: from launch to $10M ARR in about 16 months, $29M raised, and G2 reviews (4.9) that consistently praise the same things — a dashboard non-analysts actually understand, daily refreshes, unlimited seats on every plan, and an MCP server for querying your data from AI assistants. For pure tracking polish, nothing in this list clearly beats it.
Agency plans (from $245/mo) and multi-project structures are well thought through, which is why so many European agencies standardized on it.
The modular-pricing catch
The $95/mo Starter includes 50 prompts, one project, and — the key detail — three models. So does every other tier: coverage beyond your included three costs $35–165 per model per month, Claude and DeepSeek are Enterprise-only, and Grok isn't offered at all. Configured for realistic coverage, actual bills land 30–50% above the advertised price, which changes its comparison against flat-priced rivals.
Two structural gaps matter more with time: there's no historical backfill (your data starts at subscription, so competitor baselines take months to accumulate), and Peec is deliberately monitoring-only — it diagnoses visibility without recommending or executing fixes, and offers no revenue attribution.
| Line item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Starter (50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project) | $95/mo |
| Each additional model | $35–165/mo |
| Claude / DeepSeek tracking | Enterprise only |
| Grok tracking | Not available |
| Agency plans | From $245/mo |
| Typical real-world bill vs sticker | +30–50% |
Who should buy it
Teams and agencies that want best-in-class tracking UX and will price out their true model mix before signing — as a measurement layer, it's arguably the category's most refined.
Teams wanting guidance or execution on top of measurement should look at action-oriented platforms, and budget buyers should compare Peec's configured price, not its sticker, against flat-rate trackers.
Peec AI pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $95/mo | 50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project, unlimited seats |
| Model add-ons | $35–165/mo each | Coverage beyond your included 3 models |
| Agency | From $245/mo | Multi-client structure, white-label reporting |
| Enterprise | Custom | Claude, DeepSeek, SSO, support |
How Peec AI compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peec AI (#39) | AI visibility tracker | From $95/mo | Marketing teams that want the category's most polished tracking dashboard and will pay per-model add-ons to complete the coverage. |
| Promptwatch (#2) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding. |
| Otterly.AI (#4) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data. |
| LLM Pulse (#21) | AI visibility tracker | From €49/mo | Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence. |
Key features
- Per-prompt visibility scoring over time
- Screenshot evidence for every measurement
- Competitor share tracking per prompt
- Source and citation breakdowns
Frequently asked questions
Why is Peec ranked here despite its popularity?
It's an excellent tracker — the G2 scores are earned. But configured coverage costs 30–50% above sticker via per-model add-ons, there's no historical backfill, and it stops at monitoring while the category has moved toward recommendations and action.
What does Peec really cost?
Starter is $95/mo with 3 models included; each additional model runs $35–165/mo, Claude and DeepSeek need Enterprise, and Grok isn't available. Price your actual model mix before comparing.
Does Peec tell me what to fix?
No — it's deliberately monitoring-only. You get precise visibility data across engines; strategy, content changes, and attribution happen elsewhere.
Best Peec AI alternatives
See allDaily AI visibility tracking with screenshot evidence, instant alerts, and competitor share across every major engine.
Best for: Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding.
- Six engines with daily cadence at SMB pricing
- Screenshot evidence behind every data point
The easiest standalone GEO tracker to set up — a working dashboard inside an hour.
Best for: SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.
- Fastest setup in the category
- Genuine free trial without a credit card
Bootstrapped Barcelona tracker with honest pricing, unlimited seats, and MCP on every plan.
Best for: Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.
- Genuinely transparent: published pricing, 14-day trial, unlimited seats everywhere
- Bootstrapped and profitable — no VC burn-rate risk, unlike much of the category
YC-backed tracker with daily 600-prompt volume and a built-in content engine.
Best for: Teams that want maximum daily answer volume plus content production in one tool — and accept betting on a lightly-funded startup with zero review footprint.
- Best per-answer economics in the category: ~108,000 answers/mo at $599
- Daily cadence on everything, not weekly